The method of the paleographer involves, on the one hand, recognizing the wording that will commonly comprise a specific written document; on the other hand, distinguishing first words, then letters of the alphabet.
Even aged American English census records, Christian church records, and deeds of conveyance can be hard to interpret. Even those who translate the words may have trouble understanding the ancient handwriting and print. A crucial distinction to recall is that a good deal of the writing is "phonetic." Writers penned the name as proficiently as they could by however it sounded.
Just as America is a composite of immigrants from other nations and cultures, American English is a compounding derived words and influences. Early American handwriting, though, inclines to be more territorial in nature. It is more often than not established on the oral communication and acquired handwriting (and script style) of the local occupants. Immigrant Germans in Pennsylvania frequently employed Fraktur; English immigrants in Virginia and the Scotch-Irish in North Carolina, for instance, practiced the English hand; and many of the French immigrants in Louisiana used the flamboyant French manner of handwriting. The script style, as well as the jargon and slang, are embodied in the written (and printed) word. Abbreviations, contractions, and acronyms comprised very much a part of the linguistic process.
As a whole, a scrivener (scribe or writer) maintains the unvaried fashion for his documents inside an established period of time, but the expressive style can alter with the years (consider your own writing, for instance). Try to discover a written document by the same author and already translated to utilize as an example. If not, search additional examples of the same time period. A class in paleography can be very valuable to someone wishing to increase their skills at reading old documents, a skill beneficial to genealogists.
Source Information: GenWeekly, New Providence, NJ, USA: Genealogy Today LLC, 2009.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Genealogy Today LLC.
*Effective May 2010, GenWeekly articles that are more than five years old no longer require a subscription for full access.
Would you like to browse through our collection of GenWeekly articles written exclusively for Genealogy Today? Yes, take me there Would you like to keep up-to-date with the latest releases from Genealogy Today, along with news from a variety of other sources by receiving The Genealogy News (a FREE service) by email? Yes, sign me up Would you like to become a Genealogy Today member and be able to manage your research experience, post messages to forums, add comments to resources and much more? Yes, show me how Would you like to tap into our community of over 85,000 members by posting a query and get assistance breaking down your most difficult brickwalls? Yes, show me how Would you like to go shopping in a marketplace of over 700 items, including charts, scrapbooking materials, books and a variety of unique gifts and supplies? Yes, take me there