What's New in Genealogy ... Today!
click to view original photo

Genealogical Value of the Southern Twang

Everyone's heard it "y'awl, awl-rite", but did you know the Southern twang can help you discover your ancestral origins? The Southern accent is derived from dialects spoken in different regions of the British Isles.

Share

Content Details

Type: Article
Resource: GenWeekly
Prepared by: Nathan Murphy
Word Count: 508 (approx.)
Short URL:

Add Comment

Everyone's heard it "y'awl, awl-rite", but did you know the Southern twang can help you discover your ancestral origins? The Southern accent is derived from dialects spoken in different regions of the British Isles. Early colonists transported it with them across the Atlantic and even though it has largely disappeared in the Mother Country; the accent survived in its rebellious child. Social historians utilize clues like this to learn more about peoples for whom few written records survive and knowledge of linguistic origins narrows the British regions for genealogists to search for immigrant origins.

Tracing the British roots of Southern colonial ancestors has always posed research obstacles for genealogists. Wars, fires, harsh living conditions, illiteracy, and natural disasters have ruined much of the South's written legacy. In Albion's Seed, David Hackett Fischer explains that alternative techniques can be implemented to learn more about the origins of Southern colonists. He explores similar architecture, eating habits, vocabulary, accents, and marital rituals between American colonists and regionally separated groups in the British Isles. Synthesizing studies by many authors, he demonstrates that many of these distinguishing customs come from specific areas in the British Isles. Fischer categorizes two of the major groups who settled in the South as the "Borderers" and those who came from the South of England.

The "Borderers" came from Northern England, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. The "Borderer" or "Scotch-Irish" immigrants clustered together in frontier American settlements. In the backcountry, it was common to hear phrases such as "whar for where, thar for there, hard for hired, critter for creature, sartin for certain … he-it for hit, far for fire … nekkid for naked … wrassle for wrestle … winder for window … and young-uns for young ones." In Southern Scotland and Northern England, Britons use the same pronunciation. Fischer points out that country musicians, Western actors, and presidents (like Bill Clinton) have broadcast this dialect throughout the world. (Albion's Seed, 652-655.)

Many people from Southern England settled in Maryland, Virginia, the Carolinas, and the West Indies. Historians estimate that the majority of Southern Colonists who had British roots fit into this group. Fischer states that people in Southern England became ashamed of their accent as the modern-British English dialect gained prestige. The embarrassment caused eventual linguistic death. Fischer identifies, "vahmint for vermin, mo' for more, flo' for floor, do' for door … dis for this, dat for that, dare for there, ax for ask … foller for follow, yaller for yellow … [and] redundancies … as in you all or y'awl for you" as Southern English dialects brought to the US South. (Albion's Seed, 256-264.) This transported dialect mushroomed in America and continues today.

Genealogists as well as historians are tenaciously persistent. No matter how difficult the obstacles they confront, they continue forward, devising ever more elaborate methods to solve what seem to be insurmountable research problems. Dialectical origins help narrow the British regions genealogists must search to connect with the Old Country.

Read more about it:

Fischer, David Hackett, Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).

Source Information: GenWeekly, New Providence, NJ, USA: Genealogy Today LLC, 2004.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Genealogy Today LLC.

*Effective May 2010, GenWeekly articles that are more than five years old no longer require a subscription for full access.

Recent Feedback:
  • No matches for this listing.
  • Was this article helpful?   Yes No
    Your E-Mail   >> (optional)
    Comments   >>
    Privacy Level N   >>

    << GenWeekly

    << Helpful Articles

     

    Suggested Next Steps (BETA)

  • Would you like to browse through our collection of GenWeekly articles written exclusively for Genealogy Today? Yes, take me there
  • Would you like to keep up-to-date with the latest releases from Genealogy Today, along with news from a variety of other sources by receiving The Genealogy News (a FREE service) by email? Yes, sign me up
  • Would you like to become a Genealogy Today member and be able to manage your research experience, post messages to forums, add comments to resources and much more? Yes, show me how
  • Would you like to tap into our community of over 85,000 members by posting a query and get assistance breaking down your most difficult brickwalls? Yes, show me how
  • Would you like to go shopping in a marketplace of over 700 items, including charts, scrapbooking materials, books and a variety of unique gifts and supplies? Yes, take me there