As part of their interrogation in various tax years, assessors inquired concerning children's ages and educations, household by household. In Kentucky in 1822, they obtained from each tax payer statistics concerning the total number of children between the ages of 4 and 14. They did this again in 1829. The list in 1829 reveals interesting statistics for literacy rates as it asks how many of those children actually received educational training the prior year. In the 1840s, assessors asked tax payers how many children they had in their homes between the ages of 7 and 17. This information provides additional statistical illumination and credence to contemporary federal censuses.
An individual's migration patterns can be tracked by comparing information from tax lists from varying counties and states. Thomas Highley, a young blacksmith in his twenties, who labored near his home on the Blackwater River in Franklin County, Virginia, appears in that county's tax lists from 1811 through 1813. When a person disappears from a tax list, we must assume one of three things (1) that person died, (2) that person became exempt, or (3) that person moved. We were able to determine the third option, as he reemerges in Bath County, Kentucky, where he may be found from 1815 through 1817. It seems he evaded his taxes in 1814 and again in 1818. Thomas Highley made his final move to Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, where he may be found on the annual tax lists from 1819 through 1840. He died there, probably at his home along Cypress Creek, in 1840/1841.
This strategy for tracking a person's migrations is very useful to research and can provide evidence that people with the same name in two locations are the same person. The process of finding the individual in unindexed tax lists organized by counties can be time consuming. One useful tip is to use people-locators, such as federal censuses and statewide marriage indexes, to pinpoint which county tax lists should be searched.
Other articles in this series:
Source Information: GenWeekly, New Providence, NJ, USA: Genealogy Today LLC, 2004.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Genealogy Today LLC.
*Effective May 2010, GenWeekly articles that are more than five years old no longer require a subscription for full access.
Would you like to browse through our collection of GenWeekly articles written exclusively for Genealogy Today? Yes, take me there Would you like to keep up-to-date with the latest releases from Genealogy Today, along with news from a variety of other sources by receiving The Genealogy News (a FREE service) by email? Yes, sign me up Would you like to become a Genealogy Today member and be able to manage your research experience, post messages to forums, add comments to resources and much more? Yes, show me how Would you like to tap into our community of over 85,000 members by posting a query and get assistance breaking down your most difficult brickwalls? Yes, show me how Would you like to go shopping in a marketplace of over 700 items, including charts, scrapbooking materials, books and a variety of unique gifts and supplies? Yes, take me there